Home > Anuradha Sengupta, CNN IBN, Farce, Indian Media, Rajni, Sivaji > Sivaji v/s Sengupta

Sivaji v/s Sengupta

I had previously written a post depicting the sorry state of affairs the Indian Media was mired in. And we had more proof of it now in the form of a an absolutely inflamatory post that CNN-IBN’s Featuring Editor, Ms Anuradha SenGupta had written on her personal blog on, note this, IBN’s website.

It all started with the publishing of the post titled “Sivaji The Boss. Of Crap”. Herein, the author tries to express her personal opinion about a movie which was in a language in which she can hardly pronounce a couple of words properly. And this she confesses in her post. But immaterial of her linguistic knowledge, Sengupta actually goes on to air her opinion (or a review,as you deem fit) on a movie which she has no clue about except that it is one of the biggest and had some actor from a forgettable 80s film.

When one goes through the post, it is quite evident that Sengupta has little idea what Rajni Kanth means or what his movies mean to the ordinary movie audience. She went on to pass a judgement on the movie , about an actor whose acting skills she had no idea , about the audience whom she had the cheek to call a herd of pigs without even trying to understand their sentiments and emotions. And this according to her is a personal opinion published on a news channel’s website, so that millions will read it and accept it per se.

Now this post obviously irritated a lot of people, as was evident from the 1000 odd comments that had poured in, not because it had lambasted the movie, but because it had ridiculed the actor, pulled into question the sentiment of the general audience and for the sheer crassness of the opinion.

Now this immediately had Sengupta come up with a 9 point retort, which again showed how insensible she was when it came to receiving criticisms. She tries to justify each and every word of her post with an equally crass explanation, while comfortably forgetting the herd part and trying to be sarcastic.

Anuradha Sengupta has watched this movie with no idea on what to expect and what she should not. While she suggests that numerous other movies are equally bad, she hasn’t singled out any one of them and launched a tirade against it. So why Sivaji?

As my friend Divakar had commented on that website, and I quote verbatim

Why is that actors from the south are always termed as “Southern Sensation” even if they take regional cinema to global level,having a fan following which even Hollywood stars envy of? Aren’t you proud that he is an Indian?Aren’t you proud that even our Prime Minister talked about Rajnikanth in the Japanese parliament amidst huge applause? Is it only Amitabh’s and Sharukh’s who make India proud?”

Sengupta does all this under the guise of freedom of speech. But little did she realise that she was not comfirming to any of the guidelines that were laid down when someone needs to even comment on a post. She not just hurt the sentiments of millions of fans around, but hung on to her opinions steadfast, even when she was pointed out the obvious flaws in her post.

Sivaji, accepted, is not a great movie. The storyline is cliched. The plots are thin and predictable. But the movie is one that was made for Rajni fans , prima facie. It had all the elements that Rajni fans have come to expect from his movies. It was entertaining, it had all the elements that make u forget the outside world and indulge in sheer fantasy, plus it carried a message, albeit a minor one. And the regular moviegoer is satisfied.

This post of hers has actually brought in some self styled movie pundits with their comments and “appreciations” for writing such a “daring” article. These fools neither know nor understand the sentiments of Rajni’s fans/audience. Many of them have neither seen Sivaji, and a few of them wouldn’t even recognise Rajni Kanth on screen. To a few of them, only Akira Kurosowa and Scorsese are the directors whose movie are worth watching. These are the same guys who will watch Keanu Reeves or Vin Diesel do mind numbing stunts without questioning its logic. To all these idiots, I say, balls to you.

And many trash us for being blind Rajni followers. Do you guys have any idea why we adulate him? Do you think people sitting in places like US, UK, France,Sweden ,Australia are fond of him for no reason ? Are you calling them fools and no-brainers? If you think that Sivaji is not a good movie and Rajni Kanth is not a good actor, you are entitled to all your personal opinions. But draw the line there. You can keep your shit about comparing Rajni with others and ridiculing his fans to yourself. Nobody asks for it. Don’t think you can garner a few brownie points just by trashing someone. You will end up being a loser when you all you wanted to prove so desparately was that you were not one.

Anuradha Sengupta did just that.

I have never had a great opinion on CNN IBN. Its nowhere in comparison with its parent corporation CNN, and the legendary BBC , which are way too refined and sensible. NDTV quite matches the sensibility that these two news channels have, but all others here are a mere farce.

Anuradha Sengupta, by issuing a disclaimer, feels that she can shield her channel from all the bad blood. But unfortunately, this will not work.Being an editor, she should have had atleast the common sense to refrain from posting something this stupid on her channel’s blog.But no, she publishes it and asks us not to target the channel, without realising that she is a part of that very channel and whatever she says or does will reflect on IBN’s image.

I, for one, have decided to stop watching CNN IBN for now. I have already done something to this effect by removing that frequency from my Tely. I maybe attaching a little emotional value to this decision, but the sheer crassness of the opinion of one of its editors makes me really want to give IBN the miss.

Adios…

(

Update : IBN is hellbent on tarnishing its image with some sicko reporter putting up another post filled with racial sarcasm. And I thought Rajdeep will be a sensible editor. Won’t these guys ever change ????

http://www.ibnlive.com/blogs/sanjeebmukherjea/262/2126/rajini-the-blogbuster.html

)

  1. July 5, 2007 at 12:16 pm | #1

    You said it man…she was indeed crap…just forget about her..she is a non entity as far as the Rajini world is concerened..

  2. Ravikumar
    July 5, 2007 at 12:19 pm | #2

    Kanagaraju,

    great article. I think people like you should write more than the stupid, underinformed, intelectually impaired sengupta. Hats off to you for the article.

    Ravikumar.

  3. sri
    July 5, 2007 at 2:34 pm | #3

    sri
    Hey I am not a first day watcher of Super star movies, probably watched few of his movies and fewer movies in theater. But I like him.

    “If it was her personal opinion what made her the link in the opening/home page of cnn ibn. Most of the hindi films are crap including the big hit films like k3g, devadoss -( what is the story it actuall glorifies a drunkard who has no self control). They have been made hits because of the grandeur which is being now competed by southern films.

    When she has taken effort to see a movies whose review was out hours after the release of the movie she could have easily avoided as evryone had mentioned the story was not new. Has she also taken any effort to see movies with good story line(there are so many being released) and blogged on it.. She could ave done that why she did not do it because she knows people would not read it.

    I am sure rajni and the producers have not gone behind the media ( if they had done so the media has a responsibility to reveal it) but the media that has gone behind them

    By the way I was searching for a reason to stop looking at the cnn ibnwebsite and when this was published decided not to watch ther after. Hae come to know that many have taken similar decisins

  4. bunny
    July 6, 2007 at 1:43 am | #4

    hey ezhil.. nice blog…

    you really rock!!!!

    kudos !!!

  5. July 6, 2007 at 6:37 am | #5

    @Siva
    A non entity she sure is. Such a misinformed article on our movie icon.

    @Ravi & Bunny
    Thank you :) .

    @Sri
    A couple of my friends have taken the same decision too. If all she wanted was to express her “opinions”, she had done it. But it took its toll on IBN.

  6. kulothungan
    July 6, 2007 at 5:28 pm | #6

    okkaali…. avala thookunga da….

  7. July 6, 2007 at 10:13 pm | #7

    Awesome write-up dude. You said it right on behalf of all the Thalaivar fans. We just need to ignore her and the self-styled movie critics (there is only a very small bunch of them) who trash the movie. We should see to it that stuff like this does not hamper our celebrations of The Boss.

  8. Sanjev
    July 7, 2007 at 1:46 am | #8

    Thalaiva U hit the Bullseye , she needs lots of Digene & Gelusil to calm her burning stomach .
    “The Collection in theatre parkings for Sivaji has crossed Individually all of the Hit film Hindhi collection ”

    Do write more like this

  9. Arunan
    July 7, 2007 at 3:43 am | #9

    great and fitting write-up …

  10. Sam Thomas.
    July 7, 2007 at 4:08 am | #10

    Man, IBN clarified that that blog just some space for IBN employee’s not its IBN’s blog in their website. She just used her blog to say her thoughts. She says it is not review, but just her dissatisfaction on movie. Our movie belong to Tamil nadu and Andra. Shankar did not planned it for Indian audience. But unexpected media projection and hype created because of that these idiots came to see the movie without knowing what to expect.

    Its different mindset of Indian, especially Bengal Sen’s that hollywood high budget products should be commercial, but Indian product should be artistic. She that why the hell they spent 60+ crore of a commercial film?

    IBN’s Anuratha Sengupta and Rediff’s Raja Sen makes me feel like they bengal are non-’sen’se people.

  11. selvan
    July 7, 2007 at 9:40 am | #11

    One of the comments on her article: Pigs should eat shit; not review articles.
    Ms. Senseless Sen should limit her crap to idiotic Hindi and boring Bengali films

  12. July 7, 2007 at 11:25 pm | #12

    hi…see this toon i made…on anuradha!
    http://www.toondoo.com/View.toon?param=32589

    Arun.

  13. praveen
    July 8, 2007 at 2:07 am | #13

    good article man! she is stupid, period.

  14. Lover Of Style King Rajini
    July 8, 2007 at 9:35 pm | #14

    Sengupta has not offended just the movie but the 10 crore and odd Rajini fans around the globe by calling them pigs.

    Rajini fans must retaliate not by calling her back the pig but showing restraint and boycotting her CNN IBN.

  15. July 9, 2007 at 9:08 am | #15

    @kulothungan: Chalukyan half blood, WTF are u doin here? Sivaji Rao Gaekwad is not a kannadiga. Not a telugu too.
    Kalingathu parani paadiya kizhavan en kayyil kedachchan, seththaan.

    “Ariyum sivanum onnu
    Itha ariyathavan vaayila mannu”

  16. Ravikumar
    July 9, 2007 at 1:11 pm | #16

    Not sure even after reading this fact, she would come to know what level of stupidity she committed on CNN IBN blog. Thank you Ezhil for this post!

  17. July 10, 2007 at 5:03 am | #17

    All us Rajni fans will prove to this world that we cannot be taken for granted anymore .

    Thalaivar Vaaazhga !

  18. Nandakumar KV
    July 11, 2007 at 3:45 am | #18

    rightly scribed..
    A person who was so passionately and ecstatically talking about the movie during the pre-release scoops of sivaji aired on cnn-ibn, is surprisingly a critic when it comes to her personal opinion.. talk about double standards.. Her scribbles are anything but flimsy attempts of
    getting her share of the spotlight, which indeed has backfired..
    Well, we had the last laugh.. second week of july, sivaji is laughing all the way to the banks.., any publicity is good publicity for sivaji.. :)

  19. Nandakumar KV
    July 11, 2007 at 3:47 am | #19

    rightly scribed..
    A person who was so passionately and ecstatically talking about the movie during the pre-release scoops of sivaji aired on cnn-ibn, is surprisingly a critic when it comes to her personal opinion.. talk about double standards.. Her scribbles are nothing but some flimsy attempts of getting her share of the spotlight, which indeed has backfired..
    Well, we had the last laugh.. second week of july, sivaji is laughing all the way to the banks.., any publicity is good publicity for sivaji.. :)

  20. aapu
    July 11, 2007 at 4:59 am | #20

    are rajini fans related to AVM? y do dey worry abt da collections?

  21. July 11, 2007 at 8:39 am | #21

    Macchan the actual fact is that these norhtern sensation are no match to Rajini … Yaar i am a tamilian ..but i am no hardcore fan..any how no tamilian can remain without loving rajini…What irritated was her total disrespect to such a large portion of people…typical northern media babe… they can never understand us but this lady proved that they are also jealous …Bcoz she must be either incredibly jealous or incredibly STUPID to write such a f**k*n article

  22. July 11, 2007 at 10:23 am | #22

    Check out…she is now moving over from cnn ibn blog to a personal blog.. and she admits she underestimated the power of Rajini…

  23. July 11, 2007 at 10:43 am | #23

    Yeah. She realised that atleast now. :)

  24. Kevin
    July 11, 2007 at 6:37 pm | #24

    It is so amusing to see that just by crticizing one personality can evoke such non-sensical reaction from level headed people. I really pity you guys. Come on…. he is just a human being and it was jsut a blog. Stop being Don Quixotes fighting imaginary enemies. Poor miss Sengupta…… To all the fans of Mr Rajnikant (or who so ever he is…) he is just a human being of 210 bones with connective cells called blood and five sense organs, stop being so emotional and devote your energy to s omething constructive. Take care… you really need it

  25. Kevin
    July 11, 2007 at 6:39 pm | #25

    One blog can give rise to such net wide war. I think this must be the officially the first world war on net….. aka Rajni War…. Let is see who drops the nuke this time………….. ha ha ha

  26. Deepal
    July 12, 2007 at 4:33 am | #26

    Down with IBN and down with Anuradha SenGupta.

    She deserves to be spat at.

  27. July 12, 2007 at 10:12 am | #27

    she is moving to personal blog.. http://senguptaspeak.blogspot.com/

    atleast that step in right direction (/listening to comments).!! don’t you think ?

  28. July 12, 2007 at 11:07 am | #28

    @ Kevin
    I think I’ve already answered your queries in my post.

    @ Deepal
    Atleast she had removed that from IBN’s website now.

    @Yuva
    It definitely is a step in the right direction. But IBN still sucks… take a look at this link !

    http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/07/14/091349.php

  29. maverick
    July 17, 2007 at 4:57 am | #29

    did anyone hear that anuradha changed her name to anuradha swinegupta?

  30. Saravanan Bangalore
    August 6, 2007 at 11:36 am | #30

    100 % Tamil movies are better then Hindhi..Ask hindhi directors & actors,they will agree …not these anuradha etc etc,,,what she knew about a movie..simply with a group dance ..just shit & watch the

    ek thuje kelia
    hindustani,
    mukabula,
    nayak
    these are very few samples ..translated from tamil.many super dooper hit is not yet Remaked

    I agree movies like lagan,dilse are good and am proud to say that my country films are good

    But you cant compete these with Tamil Films which even Ameer khan agrees.that y he is staring at gajini now..once if the movie comes u will recognize my views.

    She dont know Tamil its ok…still u can see it ..with an open eyes ..u can understand every thing,,but not as an adement & with jelous..

  31. Nathan
    December 13, 2007 at 4:53 pm | #31

    Anuradha made a mistake in not understanding the movie and then writing against it, she could have posted her opinion about her dislikes since every1 has their right to do that, but insulting the audience and making sarcastic remarks of the language and the content of the film is way different than expressing ones dislikes/likes about the movie. I don’t think hers was a review of Sivaji but a personal attack rather thn her opinions on the movie w/o any key knowledge about the language. Rajinikanth has his own genre of movies to act it, and so does other actors have their own genre. Ther ws an interview abt kamal hassan and he told an intersting info, tht kamal asked rajinikanth why does he always to do stylish movies. Rajinikanth simply said, thts his key to success and like evry other actor knows their key to success and each of them are different, so is rajinikanth’s.

  1. July 12, 2007 at 10:22 am | #1